Table 2.

Summary of Simultaneous Regression Analysis for Variables Predicting Acceptability of the Frequency of Sexual Activity

Variable B SE B

 

Frequency of Sex .155 .005 .561*

 

Sexual Orientation 1.146 .148 .092*

 

Gender 1.36 .071 .205*

 

Age .017 .003 .060*

 

Relationship Status .442 .038 .110*

 

Length of Relationship            -.007 .004 -.020

 

Education .070 .010 .061*

 

Orientation*Gender -1.055 .242 -.054*

 

Gender*Freq. of Sex -.044 .005 -.135*

 

Orientation*Freq. of Sex -.122 .007 -.196*

 

Orientation*Gender* .084 .014 .068*

Freq. of Sex

 

Note: R=.236; *p<.05; **p<.001

 

 

 

Table 3.

Analysis of Variance for Acceptability of the Frequency of Sexual Activity

Comparison df F Std. Error p

 

Hetero Men vs. 11885 66.288 .005 .000

Hetero Women

 

Hetero Men vs. 11885 243.957 .007 .000

Gay Men

 

Hetero Men vs. 11885 30.999 .013 .000

Gay Women

 

Hetero Women vs. 11885 116.117 .006 .000

Gay Men

 

Hetero Women vs. 11885 4.918 .012 .027

Gay Women

 

Gay Men vs. 11885 9.474 .013 .002

Gay Women

 

 

 

 

Table 4.

Summary of Simultaneous Regression Analysis for Variables Predicting Acceptability of the Frequency of Sexual Activity

Variable B SE B

 

Acceptability of Verbal            .423 .009 .418**

Affection (VA)

 

Frequency of VA -.001 .000 -.019

 

Frequency of Sex .085 .002 .308**

 

Sexual Orientation -.106 .168 -.008

 

Gender .984 .064 .148**

 

Age .014 .003 .051**

 

Relationship Status .377 .035 .094**

 

Length of Relationship            .009 .003 .027

 

Education .031 .009 .027**

 

Orientation*Gender -.504 .286 -.026

 

Gender*Accept. Of VA .000 .000 .004

 

Orientation*Accept. of VA .004 .001 .039*

 

Orientation*Gender* -.002 .002 -.016

Accept. of VA

 

Note: R=.375; *p<.05; **p<.001

 

 

 

Table 5.

Analysis of Variance for Acceptability of the Frequency of Sexual Activity

Comparison df F Std. Error p

 

Hetero Men vs. 11884 84.237 .016 .000

Hetero Women

 

Hetero Men vs. 11884 .964 .038 .326

Gay Men

 

Hetero Men vs. 11884 .691 .053 .406

Gay Women

 

Hetero Women vs. 11884 9.182 .037 .002

Gay Men

 

Hetero Women vs. 11884 3.934 .052 .047

Gay Women

 

Gay Men vs. 11884 .013 .062 .909

Gay Women

 

 

 

Table 6.

Summary of Simultaneous Regression Analysis for Variables Predicting Acceptability of the Frequency of Sexual Activity

Variable B SE B

 

Acceptability of Physical .247 .006 .242**

Affection (PA)

 

Frequency of VPA .000 .000 .001

 

Frequency of Sex .034 .001 .122**

 

Sexual Orientation -4.171 .155 -.333**

 

Gender -4.451 .054 -.671**

 

Age .010 .002 .036**

 

Relationship Status .138 .022 .034**

 

Length of Relationship            -.004 .002 -.012

 

Education -.004 .005 -.004

 

Orientation*Gender 4.109 .280 .210**

 

Gender*Accept. Of PA .819 .007 1.034**

 

Orientation*Accept. of PA .751 .022 .427**

 

Orientation*Gender* -.773 .039 -.289**

Accept. of PA

 

Note: R=.749; *p<.05; **p<.001

 

 

 

 

Table 7.

Analysis of Variance for Acceptability of the Frequency of Sexual Activity

Comparison df F Std. Error p

 

Hetero Men vs. 11884 63.252 .016 .000

Hetero Women

 

Hetero Men vs. 11884 .508 .037 .476

Gay Men

 

Hetero Men vs. 11884 .580 .041 .446

Gay Women

 

Hetero Women vs. 11884 7.657 .036 .006

Gay Men

 

Hetero Women vs. 11884 2.563 .054 .109

Gay Women

 

Gay Women vs. 11884 .054 .063 .819

Gay Men

 

 

 

 

 

  

Table 8.

Summary of Simultaneous Regression Analysis for Variables Predicting Acceptability of the Frequency of Inappropriate Behavior with the Opposite/Same Sex

Variable B SE B

 

Frequency of Inappropriate -.063 .002 -.248**

Behavior (IB)

 

Sexual Orientation -.592 .147 -.058**

 

Gender -.293 .055 -.054**

 

Age .010 .003 .046**

 

Relationship Status -.278 .033 -.085**

 

Length of Relationship            -.002 .003 -.006

 

Education .098 .008 .105**

 

Orientation*Gender .419 .249 .026

 

Gender*Freq. of IB .003 .000 .094**

 

Orientation*Freq. of IB .003 .001 .032*

 

Orientation*Gender* -.003 .002 -.028

Freq. of IB

 

Note: R=.097; *p<.05; **p<.001

 

 

 

  

Table 9.

Analysis of Variance for Acceptability of the Frequency of Inappropriate Behavior with the Opposite/Same Sex

Comparison df F Std. Error p

 

Hetero Men vs. 11862 6.471 .005 .011

Hetero Women

 

Hetero Men vs. 11862 16.855 .007 .000

Gay Men

 

Hetero Men vs. 11862 53.298 .053 .000

Gay Women

 

Hetero Women vs. 11862 40.990 .007 .000

Gay Men

 

Hetero Women vs. 11862 49.977 .053 .000

Gay Women

 

Gay Women vs. 11862 61.344 .053 .000

Gay Men

 

 

 

 

 

 Table 10.

Summary of Simultaneous Regression Analysis for Variables Predicting Overall Relationship Satisfaction

Variable B SE B

 

Frequency of Inappropriate -.009 .003 -.054**

Behavior (IB)

 

Sexual Orientation .067 .081 .010

 

Gender -.026 .035 -.007

 

Age -.011 .002 -.071**

 

Relationship Status .179 .023 .082**

 

Length of Relationship            -.014 .002 -.081**

 

Education .067 .006 .106**

 

Orientation*Gender .245 .127 .023

 

Gender*Freq. of IB -.004 .003 -.016

 

Orientation*Freq. of IB .007 .005 .016

 

Orientation*Gender* -.129 .037 -.033**

Freq. of IB

 

Note: R=.049; *p<.05; **p<.001

 

 

 

 Table 11.

Analysis of Variance for Overall Relationship Satisfaction

Comparison df F Std. Error p

 

Hetero Men vs. 11760 1.127 .003 .288

Hetero Women

 

Hetero Men vs. 11760 2.017 .005 .156

Gay Men

 

Hetero Men vs. 11760 11.944 .036 .001

Gay Women

 

Hetero Women vs. 11760 5.534 .005 .019

Gay Men

 

Hetero Women vs. 11760 11.292 .036 .001

Gay Women

 

Gay Women vs. 11760 13.223 .037 .000

Gay Men

 

 

 

 

  

 

Plot 1.

Strength of Regression Coefficients between Frequency and Acceptability of Sex

 

 

 

 

 

Plot 2.

Strength of Regression Coefficients between Acceptability of Sexual Activity and Acceptability of Verbal Affection

 

 

 

 

 

Plot 3.

Strength of Regression Coefficients between Acceptability of Physical Affection and Acceptability of Sexual Activity

 

 

 

Plot 4.

Strength of Regression Coefficients between Frequency and Acceptability of Inappropriate Behavior

 

 

 Plot 5.

Strength of Regression Coefficients between Frequency of Inappropriate Behavior and Overall Relationship Satisfaction

 

Return to SSSSWR program

Return to Front Page